9 February 2021
A meeting with the mayor. An outcome at psychiatry.
Nezavisne reports that a citizen from Čelinac was questioned and escorted to psychiatry after requesting a meeting with the mayor and being reported for behaviour that frightened staff. According to the police statement, the prosecutor found no elements of a criminal offence in that incident.
Editorial summary
On 9 February 2021, Nezavisne published a police statement about a report received the previous day. According to that statement, the citizen was escorted by police to the UKC RS Psychiatry Clinic after questioning. The prosecutor’s position concerned the elements of a criminal offence in that incident; it was not a medical assessment.
Police described behaviour that frightened City Administration staff as the reason for their response. The article does not say that the mayor or municipality decided on psychiatric detention. We omit the person’s identity and make no assumptions about their health.
Criminal and medical grounds are distinct. Articles 29–33 of the 2020 Mental Health Protection Act address medical assessment, consent and conditions for intervention without consent. The news report alone does not establish which procedure was used, whether the person was detained or the outcome. Reasons for treatment are not decided by an online vote.
UKC was then headed by general director Vlado Đajić, as also confirmed by an Anadolu report from February 2021. In a 2020 feature for Alo, he spoke about growing up in Branešci, in the municipality of Čelinac. The citizen in the report was also from Čelinac, according to the police statement. This is a geographical overlap: the sources reviewed do not document any role for Đajić in this case or any link between place of origin and the actions of police or doctors.
The later concert context spans several years. On 27 September 2022, BUKA reported a statement by Transparency International BiH spokesperson Srđan Traljić about a concert in Čelinac at which Đajić, according to Traljić, gave an election campaign speech. This is an attributed statement by an observer; this entry does not establish an electoral violation or the source of the concert funding.
On 24 July 2025, Banjaluka.net relayed Đajić’s invitation to a free concert in Čelinac the following day at 8 pm, featuring Breskvica, Indira Radić, Dejan Matić and Alen Islamović. On 26 July, Srpskainfo reported thousands of visitors and relayed his announcement of another gathering. A large audience is not a measure of political popularity or proof that Đajić is the most popular person in Čelinac.
Ahead of the 2026 election, another concert in Čelinac, “Veliko krajiško veče”, was announced for 4 September. On 2 September, Srpskainfo relayed Đajić’s statement that it was being postponed because of an unspecified new situation and that the public would be informed of a new date. The headline says cancelled, but the body says postponed. That report confirms neither a new date nor that the concert took place.
On 4 October 2026, after the election, Avaz reported Đajić’s claim: “Pokradeni smo” (“We were robbed”). He announced that he would seek a way to prove a discrepancy between the votes reported to him by members and voters and the votes counted. This is his allegation about the election result, not an established finding of electoral fraud. The article reviewed provides no such ruling or proof; a subsequent outcome has not been confirmed.
The 2021 case, the concerts and the election statement are separate events, brought together here to comment on public roles and recurring announcements. The irony targets political presentation and the wait for a new clinic, documented in the linked entries. It does not suggest that a concert, place of origin or personal connection determined medical care, or that treatment funds were spent on entertainment.
The original report was published on 9 February 2021; the incident was reported the day before. The concerts and election statement are later context from 2022–2026. The medical grounds, consent and subsequent outcome of the individual case are unknown; this does not prove that there were no medical grounds.
Check for yourself
This entry’s sources
Source titles retain their original form. Quotations on the Cyrillic site are transliterated without changing the wording; the original is linked at the source. Reprints of the same story are not independent confirmations.
The article relays a Banja Luka Police Administration statement. Its URL and image description retain an earlier headline about threats; the visible headline refers to staff being frightened. No medical decision or later outcome is published. We omit the individual’s identity.
Content checked: 21 October 2026The attached original 2020 text was read, especially Articles 29–33 on medical assessment, consent and detention. It provides a framework for distinguishing procedures, not proof of its application in this case or a comprehensive review of legislation in force in 2026.
Content checked: 21 October 2026In the feature, Đajić describes growing up and attending school in Branešci, Čelinac municipality. That biographical fact does not establish involvement in anyone’s referral to psychiatry.
Content checked: 21 October 2026This contemporary report is used only to confirm Đajić’s role as director general in February 2021, not to connect vaccination with this case.
Content checked: 21 October 2026Relays Đajić’s invitation to a concert at 8 pm on 25 July 2025, listing performers and free entry. The announcement alone does not establish who financed the concert.
Content checked: 21 October 2026The report and relayed Đajić posts describe thousands of attendees and a further gathering. This is not a political popularity survey or evidence that he was Čelinac’s most popular public figure.
Content checked: 21 October 2026The article and metadata were read: published on 27 September 2022, later updated on 23 May 2024. This entry uses Traljić’s account of Đajić’s campaign speech at a concert in Čelinac; it is not treated as a finding by a court or the Central Election Commission.
Content checked: 21 October 2026The report, published at 21:03, relays Đajić’s statement postponing a concert scheduled for 4 September 2026. The headline says cancelled; the body says postponed. This report confirms neither a new date nor that the concert took place.
Content checked: 21 October 2026The report of Đajić’s allegation and announced search for proof was read. The article does not establish electoral fraud; it cites a preliminary result. Final figures and the subsequent outcome of his allegation have not been confirmed.
Content checked: 21 October 2026Have an addition or correction?
Send a source and identify the part of the entry it concerns. We publish verifiable additions and institutional responses alongside the event.
Suggest a correction