Polluting particles, relocation and construction without permit.

Editors’ summary

Šobot link relocation of old boiler house to polluting particles. E say the new plant use pellets and get lower capacity. E cite City guidance and dispute complaints about fuel type.

CAPITAL report the inspector finding say work begin and dem carry am out without construction permit, with order to remove am and restore original state. Šobot confirm appeal.

We never directly review the order and emissions measurements; appeal result never confirm. The statement no establish pollution levels for every preceding year, and photographs no prove fuel composition.

For the initiative, heating, clean air and lawful construction na shared concern. We call make dem publish permits, site plan wey show distances from patient rooms and neighbouring buildings, and emissions measurements.

Claims about polluting particles and construction permit na separate matters. Without full order, we no relabel construction inspection as environmental finding. The linked health dossier ask about consistency for public institution heating choices, while e retain UKC response.

We attribute claim about order to relocate boiler house to Šobot. To verify wetin authority actually order, we need the full publicly available document: reducing emissions, relocation and other measures no be interchangeable.

„Zbog povećanog obima zagađujućih čestica“

Translation

“Because polluting particles increase”